It all begins with some friendly Muslims who express to each other a desire to meet under the Islamic banner for worship and community. They might not be many, but perhaps just enough to pool their resources, and voila....suddenly a small prayer hall or "Islamic Centre" is proposed in the midst of the non Muslim community.
Then, the local community expresses opposition, and complaints are lodged with Council against the proposed planning application which is subsequently denied by Council. The Muslims begin using the terms "Intolerant" and "Racist" of the Locals, and try to baffle the Media with such statements as "If they got to know us, they won't 'hate' us" "they have a lot of misconceptions about Islam".
The planning process continues, the Muslims hire some whiz bang hot shot lawyer, take the issue to the relevant appeals tribunal, in the case in my mind it is the "Land and Environment Court" of New South Wales, Australia. The proposed prayer hall was in the midst of a very solid Christian community. The lawyer was a 'progressive' type named Jeremy Bingham, a former left wing Lord Mayor of Sydney.
The local residents wishes are bulldozed into the ground, their desire for a certain 'tone' and cultural atmosphere in their own community is spat on...and stomped on in the dirt...and the Muslims win their 'prayer hall' planning project struggle. It is then built. Here it is:
Ok... our prayer hall/Islamic centre is built...and their website links to radical Iranian Ayatollahs. (these Muslims are Shia)
The next step is to make political moves to enhance their situation, grow their faith, and consolidate their position.
They will undoubtedly be linked to some kind of Australia wide "Federation of Islamic Councils" which is said to be the 'Peak body' for connecting with all things Islamic. Now we turn to my own experience with that body.
MAY 15TH 2011,
I and around 35 other people held a protest at Federation square Melbourne. This protest had one issue.. "No Sharia law". For reasons I won't go into here, the same "counter protests" populated by the same people as are currently opposing PEGIDA decided to come out an make it an 'anti racism' day. They gathered around 300 people, around 10 of whom were Muslims, including one chap to my surprise with whom I'd done Martial Arts training...that was indeed a surprise (he is Indonesian, and I speak that language).. we had a friendly chat, I explained why were are there and he went back to his 'trenches'.
In the end, the Communists, Anarchists and Unionists in the 'anti racism' crowd declared they were going to rid Federation square of our 'Nazi' and 'Fascist' presence. (that's a standard accusation that never cares about whether it's true or not). So... life became rather 'animated' when 300+ people are trying to push you around and shred your posters. Here is a video of that fateful moment and the protest.
The Herald Sun reported "Protesters Clash at Anti MUSLIM' rally" and apparently this mistaken idea of our rally was imposed on the reporter by a sub editor who wanted to 'spice it up' somewhat. You should see that the heading now reads "Anti Sharia law" rally....which resulted from my threatening legal action against the paper. But note the story:
Australian Federation of Islamic Councils president Ikebal Patel said the group was provocative and wrong to believe that most Australian Muslims wanted to bring in sharia law.
"It's of great concern that anyone is out there trying to disrupt the peaceful social fabric of Australia," he said.
Islamic Council of Victoria spokesman Nazeem Hussein said the ADL's views were uninformed and saddening.
MAY 17TH 2001 (the next day)
This same man...Ikabel Patel made a submission to the Australian government requesting SHARIA LAW!
Ikebal Patel, president of the Australian Federation of Islamic Councils, agrees the very word sharia could invoke notions of a fierce, unjust, male-dominated legal code.
"Short of trying to really find or use another word, really I would like to suggest that what the Muslim community at least in Australia has to do is to try and explain that there's no aspect of sharia that is being tried to be introduced here," he said. However, Mr Patel believes everyone would benefit if sharia law were utilised in a pluralistic society such as Australia.
DEMOGRAPHICS and DEMOCRACY.
The serious problem for Western democracies arises when there are marginal seats in which Muslims reside. Governments know that the future of the whole country can depend on the outcome of just ONE such seat, and will do all they can to obtain as broad a voter base as they can. This means they will make decisions and pronouncements that are more in their electoral interests than the National Interest.
This is the point where movements like PEGIDA come up from the grass roots of the People.
When a Government does not govern 'for' the people, but for it's own narrow electoral prospects, it does not deserve to govern, and should be thrown out. The only way to convince the public of this is to have mass rally's and demonstrations.
FOX NEWS is totally WRONG on the issue of Islam and Terrorism.
Bill O'Reilly (O'Reilly Factor) was just interviewing two "Muslims" about how to mobilize the Muslim nations 'against' Jihadism. He made a dramatic and culpable mistake... evidently due to his own lack of knowledge of Islam and the Quran.
O'REILLY "I cannot imagine that prophet mohammad wanted to have some world war to establish Islam"
QURAN 9:29 "Fight those who do not believe in Allah or in the Last Day and who do not consider unlawful what Allah and His Messenger have made unlawful and who do not adopt the religion of truth from those who were given the Scripture - [fight] until they give the jizyah willingly while they are humbled.
Can it be any clearer? YES it actually can! Look at what Muhammad himself said:
Book 1, Number 0029:
It is narrated on the authority of Abu Huraira that when the Messenger of Allah (may peace be upon him) breathed his last and Abu Bakr was appointed as his successor (Caliph), those amongst the Arabs who wanted to become apostates became apostates. 'Umar b. Khattab said to Abu Bakr: Why would you fight against the people, when the Messenger of Allah declared : I have been directed to fight against people so long as they do not say: There is no god but Allah, and he who professed it was granted full protection of his property and life on my behalf except for a right? His (other) affairs rest with Allah. Upon this Abu Bakr said: By Allah, I would definitely fight against him who severed prayer from Zakat, for it is the obligation upon the rich. By Allah, I would fight against them even to secure the cord (used for hobbling the feet of a camel) which they used to give to the Messenger of Allah (as zakat) but now they have withheld it. Umar b. Khattab remarked: By Allah, I found nothing but the fact that Allah had opened the heart of Abu Bakr for (perceiving the justification of) fighting (against those who refused to pay Zakat) and I fully recognized that the (stand of Abu Bakr) was right.
Book 1, Number 0030:
It is reported on the authority of Abu Huraira that the Messenger of Allah said: I have been commanded to fight against people so long as they do not declare that there is no god but Allah, and he who professed it was guaranteed the protection of his property and life on my behalf except for the right affairs rest with Allah.
Book 1, Number 0031:
It is reported on the authority of Abu Huraira that he heard the Messenger of Allah say: I have been commanded to fight against people, till they testify to the fact that there is no god but Allah, and believe in me (that) I am the messenger (from the Lord) and in all that I have brought. And when they do it, their blood and riches are guaranteed protection on my behalf except where it is justified by law, and their affairs rest with Allah.
Book 1, Number 0032:
It is narrated on the authority of Jabir that the Messenger of Allah said: I have been commanded that I should fight against people till they declare that there is no god but Allah, and when they profess it that there is no god but Allah, their blood and riches are guaranteed protection on my behalf except where it is justified by law, and their affairs rest with Allah, and then he (the Holy Prophet) recited (this verse of the Holy Qur'an): "Thou art not over them a warden" (lxxxviii, 22).
Book 1, Number 0033:
It has been narrated on the authority of Abdullah b. 'Umar that the Messenger of Allah said: I have been commanded to fight against people till they testify that there is no god but Allah, that Muhammad is the messenger of Allah, and they establish prayer, and pay Zakat and if they do it, their blood and property are guaranteed protection on my behalf except when justified by law, and their affairs rest with Allah.
Here we have the QURAN as the primary authority, then the Hadith (collected oral traditions) that support and echo exactly what the Quran says about war against unbelievers. THIS is why it is so easy to 'radicalize' young men, all you need to is 'show' them such verses and hadiths and voila....they realize the necessity of being involved in murderous Jihad to punish unbeliever and compel them to submit to Islamic rule.
It is imperative that we take all measures necessary to remove the threat from the Muslim community in Europe and other nations. Hammering PEGIDA who are peaceful, might have the same effect that John F Kennedy once spoke of in relation to Vietnam "If we make a peaceful revolution impossible, we make a violent revolution inevitable"
President Kennedy once visited Berlin where he said in abysmal German "Ich bin ein Berliner" "I am a 'doughnut" (when using one possible meaning) but he should have said "Ich bin Berliner" "I am a Berliner". So this is the first voice of "I am Charlie".... but now the problem is.... PEGIDA is speaking a truth that the current political establishment does not like. Will this, plus their clear anti PEGIDA attitude mean an 'inevitable' outcome that they will like even less?
FINAL ADVICE... Read this information, Realize the secular governments are deceiving you, RALLY with Pegida next time they call for it or with your local version of Pegida.. "BerlGida (Berlin) "MelbGida" (Melbourne) Sydgida (Sydney)