The Pen is mightier than the sword, but the Pen must sometimes move the sword against corruption if the corrupt are not moved by the pen.. An idea without an implementer is useless. "The Rulers do not carry the sword in vain"Rom 13:4

Sunday, September 30, 2012

A Swan and a Hawk have a battle! AFL Grand Final.

Yesterday there was a monumental battle at the MCG. A Hawk and a Swan faced off for the battle of the year. The Hawk intended to finish the Swan and consume his carcass with great culinary delight.
The Swan was not going to take that lying down!

The Hawk circled around in the first quarter, intending to give no quarter, and made aim for the Swan's neck and prepared his talons for the task. Down he swooped, legs extended, talons spread out straight for the long and vulnerable neck of that Swan.
As he was almost at the point of impact the Swan moved sideways and deflected the Hawk with a very decent wing slap.  The Hawk went down but gathered it's feathers for another go. It rested for a moment on the branch of a nearby gumtree, then revised it's strategy. Now for the second quarter it came in for the attack again, planning this time to fake a left attack and at the last moment do a right.
The Swan had been in rigid training and was on the lookout for this and when the Hawk swooped down and did the old switch trick, the Swan compensated and slapped the Hawk with the  other wing, and then added a solid peck to boot.  They went at it again in the third quater, with things about even, but then the final quater arrived. Back and forth they went, sometimes on top sometimes underneath, and in the end the Swan did a jumping spinning back wing attack and laid the Hawk out for the count.

Down, and dissappointed, the Hawk just lay there, a mess of feathers, broken talons and a cracked beak.  It would have been easy for the Swan to rock over to his bruised and battered body and finish him, but that's not the Aussie character. No, the Swan started to preen the messy feathers of the Hawk, and gave him an affectionate prod with his beak, and said "Don't worry cobber, there's always next year!"

It's a testimony of greatness to Australia, that though we might not have the numbers as  countries go, we still have something that numbers and other kinds of greatness cannot produce. The care and comfort for the underdog that we extend, even to our enemies. Our (Aussie Rules)footy clubs are not branded by race or corrupted by heinous creeds, they are stand up straight up in your face hero's in the spirit of the Snowy River and incredible Icons from Ironbark.

But we are not alone... we are facing a serious threat to our way of life and culture.
There is a bunch of academics who would hammer us to hell if we let them. They'll first blame us then beat us then berate us for all the sins of the past whether or not they occurred!
A bunch for sure, like a bunch of over-ripe banana's. Yellow, all face the same way and look down on the rest of us.

They play with our  principles and  manipulate our minds using skilful psychology, they undermine our underpinning and white ant our wills with relentless hate filled attacks on our  identity.  They crave for us to be crushed, they inflame passions against our persons and after all that claim they are pursueing the pathway of "peace".
Aussie friends, the answer to all this is first to wake up....then to get up, then to stand up and make your voice heard in the uncompromising defence of your values, culture and way of life.

Saturday, September 29, 2012

Black White relations in the USA--I had a Dream. (But the dream became a nightmare)

There was a moment when a black man stood up in front of a huge crowd in America  and told them he had a dream of a time when a person was not judged by the colour of his skin but the content of his character.

In 2012 I still have that dream! Things have changed since Martin Luther King's historical speech seeking equality with the white man.  But where has it all led? What has happened since then?

We have Jewish marxist academics from Harvard (1) calling for the abolition of the white race by any means, we have black men on the streets screaming that they hate white men, every last iota of them, and he calls for black men to kill not just the white men, but their babies as well!  He insults white women who are with a black man.  My dream is that when any man calls for the killing of another mans baby, simply because of the colour of that baby's skin, it's time to revisit history and ask a few questions.

My first question is why the US justice dept considers such a vile act not to be something worthy of it's time and attention. The head of the Justice dept is a black man. Eric Holder.  The head of that black man is another black man Barak Obama.

While most revolutions begin with the aim of removing injustice, they seem to  end up simply replacing one form of injustice with another.

Injustice brings out the best in the rhetoritician , but the process of achieving equality brings out the best and the worst in human nature and seldom ends up in equality anyway.  Then some from among former underdogs now feel cocky and want to be the new overlord.......c'est la vie

When injustice prevails, ill feeling grows, when ill feeling has reached it's term, violence is born.

Sometimes a dream can become a nightmare. When black people are oppressed, they must be freed, and when freed black men start oppressing...they must be stopped. If they arn't, the white supremacists will have complete vindication and most likely grow and grow..and grow........

(1) Noel Ignatiev "Abolish the White Race"

Friday, September 28, 2012

Feminism, Political Correctness and the SlutWalk murdered Jill Meagher!

 (UPDATE 4/12/12  Last nights news had a story about a  girl walking home drunk alone at night around Parkville.  She was molested by some person.. a male of course.  Now there is another example of utter stupidity and apparently of one who believes this mantra about living, dressing, going however they like.. irrespective of the likelihood of evil men prowling the area. As IFFFF...such beasts are going to be swayed by these ridiculous marches and demonstrations.)


Re Jill Meagher, we know 2 things for absolute certain.
1/ She went for a walk home by herself.
2/ She was raped and murdered.

The above is on the public record.

All of those things which contributed to Jill believing she can go anywhere, anytime and anyhow, are responsible for her murder.  She was either completely stupid for wandering down streets alone at 2:00am or.. she had a mindset which had been created by a long campaign of "Slutwalks" and feminist propaganda, that tells her she is 'equal' with men.

This issue opens a lot of territory, all humans are equal in law, and in value, but not in strength and that's the key issue.

How then did the murderer overcome Jill without she kicking up such a stink that half of Brunswick knew about it?
I can only assume the offender king hit her and then carried her unconscious to his vehicle or flat then removed her body later.  But he had to place her in a position of weakness in a public place prior to knocking her out, and that would have been an opportunity to shriek, scream and yell blue murder!  When a man is king hit, it's usually game over at that point...how much more would it be for a woman who is not as strong as a man?

So.. without mercy, I blame.. yes blame all those pernicious forces of  feminism and slutwalks that must have convinced Jill that 'no really means no' (Of course it does, but will that stop a determined attacker?) and that blokes who molest women will be turned off by a seriously spoken "no".  If she had time to say anything, it clearly didnt work, and that's the whole point. Of course "no" is understood by a rational normal person.  But murderers and rapists are not rational nor normal. So a 'no' to such a person is meaningless.

Jill was not intellectually stupid... she had a responsible job and moved in circles that most would call slightly elitist.
Perhaps the common mentality shared by this group reinforced her independence and solo trip home?
While we know someone offered to escort her, she apparently declined.. Why?  didn't want to be a bother?  Just believed that everyone else believed that woman can go anywhere at any time. Why would she believe this?  I suggest it's because she was the victim of cheap, shallow, ideologically driven, politically opportunistic  'feminist' rubbish which comes from Marxist sources.

Girls.... forget those idiots who dribble all that rubbish about 'no means no' and you have the 'right' to go anywhere at any time etc... they are probably beyond help even by an army of analysts. Come back to who you truly are...the weaker sex (physically) and vulnerable. Believe it or not, you are dependent on this male dominated world, but male domination does not have to diminish your value or equality. It's just that 'equality' has been presented and promoted to you in irrational ways.
Be liberated from this narrow ideological propadanda girls, be really liberated to be what you actually are. "Female" and not Male.  We love you and no matter how much you might want to deny it, you rely for your safety on us. If you don't want to accept this, then at the very least, if you go out and plan to come home late, don't do it alone... make sure you have at least 3 people with you.

Girls, before you swallow hook line and sinker the 'feminist' attack on our culture and social fabric, please consider the chain of ideas that produced the political/social ideology of Feminism.

The feminist narrative can include even a re-interpretation of things as old as Abraham, and it tries to demonstrate the 'patriachal' aspect of Abraham's almost sacrifice of his son Isaac. Of course such a re-intepretation is not only spurious it is absurd.  It reads 'back' from the ideological waywardness of the likes of Wollstonecraft and Marx 'onto' a Biblical narrative.  The important issue is 'what' drove Mary Wollstonecraft?

The family's financial situation eventually became so dire that Wollstonecraft's father compelled her to turn over money that she would have inherited at her maturity. Moreover, he was apparently a violent man who would beat his wife in drunken rages. As a teenager, Wollstonecraft used to lie outside the door of her mother's bedroom to protect her. Wollstonecraft played a similar maternal role for her sisters, Everina and Eliza, throughout her life. For example, in a defining moment in 1784, she convinced Eliza, who was suffering from what was probably post partum depression, to leave her husband and infant; (wiki)

Not exactly the kind of family environment to give one a glowing impression of 'family' or men. But sadly for the now feminist blighted world, Wollstonecraft's was only ONE family and not typical of any normal loving caring family.  Nevertheless is shaped her thinking. She was all over the place sexually and politically, today trying out lesbianism, attempting suicide the next, and then marrying a man and trying to participate in the French Revolution.. she was a total mess. She was an inconscionable adulteress.. pursuing an affair with a married artist.. so much for her ethics! She falls 'passionately in love' with an American adventurer and While Wollstonecraft had rejected the sexual component of relationships in the Rights of Woman, Imlay awakened her passions and her interest in sex
So here we see her 'Rights of women' ..which was widely disseminated, having one view of sex, and then, she happens to meet a stimulating man..and suddenly she has a reversal of her view on this.. in short, she wrote as she felt at the time, but those feelings were not anything other than her own knee jerk reaction to her circumstances.. and this fool is almost idolized by feminists ????  It's ludicrous!

In January 1798 Godwin (her husband) published his Memoirs of the Author of A vindication of the Rights of Woman. Although Godwin felt that he was portraying his wife with love, compassion, and sincerity, many readers were shocked that he would reveal Wollstonecraft's illegitimate children, love affairs, and suicide attempts. (wiki)

Wollstonecraft has had what scholar Cora Kaplan labelled in 2002 a "curious" legacy: "for an author-activist adept in many genres ... up until the last quarter-century Wollstonecraft's life has been read much more closely than her writing"  After the devastating effect of Godwin's Memoirs, Wollstonecraft's reputation lay in tatters for a century; she was pilloried by such writers as Maria Edgeworth, who patterned the "freakish" Harriet Freke in Belinda (1801) after her.

I don't know about you, but I sure has heck would never put my self into the ideological hands of such a freak as this.
Looking at the timeline of things, she was from 1759 to 97 which was before Marx had written anything. When he did, it was more Engels who contributed:

Marxist feminism's foundation is laid by Friedrich Engels in his analysis of gender oppression in The Origin of the family, Private Property and the State (1884). He argues that a woman's subordination is not a result of her biological disposition but of social relations, and that men's efforts to achieve their demands for control of women's labor and sexual faculties have gradually solidified and become institutionalized in the nuclear family. Through a Marxist historical perspective, Engels analyzes the widespread social phenomena associated with female sexual morality, such as fixation on virginity and sexual purity, incrimination and violent punishment of women who commit adultery, and demands that women be submissive to their husbands.

The first problematic issue with Engels work is the presupposition that "Gender Oppression" occurs in the nuclear family or rather.. is an inherent aspect of it.    Engels must have had a lousy family life and I would envey his wife or Jenny Von Westphalen, who apparently once said "I wish Karl would spend more time 'making' capital than writing about it".... Jenny, with Von in her name was of German nobility, a strange choice for the revolutionary Marx.  Presumably Marx and Engels wanted to destroy every 'other' nuclear family except their own.  If they believed that gender oppression was part of the nuclear family, why did both of them 'subject' these poor women to it?

The final point to be made here is the both Marx and Engels were Jewish.  That immediately opens up the whole issue of the role of women in the ancient history of Israel and the important fact that male female relations were well documented in the Old Testament.  Being very familiar with that document myself, I cannot for the life of me find this 'Gender oppression'  that is supposed to be there.  It was possible for a female to rule as Queen, as a Judge.. to own property and many other things that an 'oppressed' person would be denied.  What I do find there is a balanced culture where male and female roles were different and accepted and unless a man or woman was violent, sneaky or unfaithful, it all worked rather well!

Issues such as property, inheritance, and gender roles are part of every culture and are addressed within those cultures.  The period of the old Testament was no different. So the ultimate difficulty for women today is that they are being lied to, ideologically scewed and intellectually insulted by militant feminist prophetesses of doom and darkness. I think the best thing is to line them all up end to end and just leave them there!

Thursday, September 27, 2012

Wayne...a Swan or a big Ugly Duckling?

A Political Parody and Rant follows: (includes a 'Labor' version of the ugly duckling nursery rhyme)
This speech is absolutely copyright and no permission is given for it to be used by any party other than the original author (myself) or for any other purpose than as it is used here.

***WARNING***  This a work of art. Some of the language is very intense, it is not intended to incite anything other than reflection on our political process and in no way shape or form should be understood in any literal way where to do so might lead the reader to commit unlawful acts.

"I ask the reader to read the following carefully, as I don't know the art of making myself intelligible to those who are not attentive" (Rousseau)

Once upon a time there was a pair of ducks incubating their eggs. One egg looked much larger than the rest but they continued on until finally all the eggs hatched. Most of the offspring looked quite normal but one was much bigger than the others and it was very ugly as ducks go. As this ugly duckling grew bigger it began to peck and annoy and bully it's smaller siblings. Finally, it matured into a large black Swan, but on the inside it remained a very ugly bully of a duckling.

It took what it didn't earn, from those who could ill afford to lose it, then gave it to those who needed it least but made the most noise. In so doing he nailed his crazy credentials to the mast... he is not for the little bloke... he is for the faceless oligarchy who use the little blokes vote to reap a harvest of unjust reward from the rest of us.

 Swan claims to be able to diagnose our economic diseases and heal our financial heartaches yet I see no scars on him from the school of hard knocks and experience, no degree from the academy of fiscal responsibility, nor any MBA from the graduate school of simple addition and subtraction. In short he is a crazed crank! The fox in the henhouse, -he replaces the meritocracy with the gimmeocracy

Swan is no Political Moses leading battling, struggling Aussies through a sunburnt wilderness on their way to a utopian promised land flowing with socialist milk and honey, he is a fake messiah of monetary mismanagement, multicultural mayhem, and communal chaos, and does he do all this for the sake of  unfair tainted reward for the faceless few who strum his strings? As we amble onward down his highway to economic  hell, he sings a song to match the strumming... Dirty Deeds...done dirt cheap! But it's not to a social and economic heaven that he lead us, no, -he takes us down that broad easy highway to disadvantage damnation and economic oblivion, and when one of us who didn't vote for him stumbles he laughs and smiles like a Cheshire cat and changes his lyrics to “ bmp
bmp bmp bmp--Another one bites the dust!”  

The Psalmist says “yay though I walk through the valley of the shadow of death, I will fear no evil.... but we say “He is pushing us ever downward into the gloomy valley of fiscal death, where the dark shadow of unbearable taxation and onerous obligation comes upon us and we are terrified! The Psalmist goes on.. “thy rod and thy staff, they comfort me”... but in the Ducks case, he batters us with his rod and strikes us with his staff and we don't have the slightest bit of comfort whatsoever! His destination is not divine but diabolical,as he drags us down that highway to hell.
By the time these Raiders of our Economic Ark are finished, it is WE and the National Economy which will be lost.

 Now is the time...for a change!

Instead of Milk and Honey, he will give us the rancid swill and the foul turpid slop of entitlement lunacy and benefit dependancy. He doesn't want fair and balanced it seems, he wants mates rates and power at any price. One news organization says "we report, you decide" the Duck says "Say what you like...but I'll decide!"

He takes from the enabled and distributes to the disabled while dismantling the economy. He want's to be seen helping the helpless, giving hope to the hopeless and healing to the hapless. He wants the electorate to see him as giving comfort to the crying and care to the crippled while crippling your wallet and savings.

Now is the time...for a major change!

By the time these Raiders of our Economic Ark are finished, it is WE and the National Economy which will be lost.   Now is the time to throw  the bums out!


'YOU" can make this change in September! 

His disability insurance plan is in reality a political assurance plan because he knows there isn't enough money to fund such a scheme and  he also knows his Swan is cooked and that Labor will end up like Peking Duck in a cheap Chinese restaurant at the next election, he has put this disability insurance scheme in place so that when the new government informs the nation that the money just isn't there, he can spruke and spout about how unfair, odious and cruel they are!

He panders to the progressives while poisoning our national propriety. He'll spend like there's no tomorrow and if he keeps it up there WILL be no tomorrow, other than equality of poverty, equality of hunger and equality in the struggle for unattainable shelter.

It's definitely time, ...for a change!

He takes a 2 bob each way approach. Spending like a King, with the treasure of a peasant, while knowing that when the other mob is given control, they will have to make cuts right left and centre, up down and back to fix his fiscal fiasco, and in so doing make him look like an angel of light and his opponents look like Satan incarnate. That suits his pernicious purpose and propels him from the political periphery back to parliament for another bite at the treasury cherry.

He has already learned his lines to regain the reigns of power, he calls the opposition conservatives crazies and cranks when they are fixing the mess he created. He will be more rehearsed than Bob Carr's kabuki actor though to my mind he is more opportunistic than the big croc in the billabong, more deceptive than a Manila Scam artist and to suggest he is a Galah in a pet shop would be a grievous insult to Galah's.

A Galah might give you a nip on the finger, but a Croc will clamp his jaws on your thigh, do a death roll (your death) and tear chunks of fiscal  flesh off you to satiate his redistribution hunger. We need only look at Swan's cheer leader squad to see this, John Setka, Paul Howes, Bill Oliver and other monsters from the industrial marshes

Just when you've applied soothing balm to the lacerations and abrasions on your wallet from the stomping of his socialist hobnailed Jackboot, he stomps you again, belting your business for six, and giving you a million new rules to comply with.

The Duck's version of 'we the people' is "we the select privileged few while the masses support our lifestyles".

He has a dream... no question about that, but his dream is not that a person will be judged by the content of their character rather than the colour of their skin,* nooo sireee his dream is about the flavour of your politics and the direction of your donations. There is a promised land, but it's promised to a select few

Swan will eventually push us over a cliff and send us down in a terrifying tail spin with a terminal impact.Perhaps Mr Swan has watched too many episodes of the Road Runner where poor old Charlie Coyote goes hurtling off the cliff and crashing down onto the floor of the canyon below, only to miraculously re-appear in one piece for the next exciting episode as though nothing had happened! 

He is not a fighter for fiscal fair play, he is a wimp who listens to the whiners, whingers and the "I want more's"-he cares not about the genuinely needy but throws out the red carpet for the insatiably greedy! While holding his staff up high he leads us not through the Red sea to salvation, but down into the swamp full of Union quicksand, public service excess and demographic damnation. He want's to maximize the benefits for the marginalized, and minimize the income of money makers. But you can only do that once! Once it's gone it's gone and when you, a person with a bit of get up and go to make something of yourself are given the "sit down and shutup" by the Duck, you don't much feel like trying again because you know the ugly duck will just give you another painful peck in the purse

Jesus turned water into wine for a wedding celebration, He added value! The Duck will turn wine into water, erode value from the economy and festoon us for a funeral!

NOW IS THE TIME ….to rethink......

If this Duck is allowed to continue at the helm, he will surely bring us to a promised land. A land of unimaginable wealth for Union bosses and faceless men and very imaginable financial pain for the persevering patriots of "I'll do it myself and make it work." It won't be the lion laying down with the lamb in this Ducks messianic vision, it will be the vicious Union lion eating the lambs and sheep. Make no mistake...The Duck's promise is not pleasant except for the faceless 'elect'

The first time Marxism was taken from idea to implementation, it was by Lenin, and how many workers did he mow down with the machine gun when the implementation ended up like a Jelly with no gelatine..a sloppy runny mess!
Swan will tax the rich into poverty and populate the public service with the politically correct, only to run out of financial resources for everyone in the first few years.

Oh yes he will achieve his classless society, the only class left after Swan's ideological attack will be the equally broke, equally miserable and equally hopeless.

When the Titanic sailed from Southampton there were many social and economic classes on board, but after it hit that iceberg there were only 2 classes...those who could swim and those who sank.

Broke people become disturbed and then they become desperate and then they start to demand "who the hell did this to us????" Then you see those red eyes rising above the waterline, scaley political predators and persuasive agitators come in like beasts and start naming and shaming whether true or not, they offer a solution and the uninformed brutes among the masses respond.. 'Release for us Barabbas" they scream... and the cycle starts all over again.

Today Marxism masquerades as a fluffy puppy, a cuddle toy, a caring sharing flower sniffing tree hugging animal liberating friend.... but beware.....it has only transformed from the raging revolutionary to the fabian gradualist for a time of it's own convenience!

This is not a war for the feeble the fragile or the fainthearted, it is a struggle for the future of this great country and it needs the brave, the bold and the battle ready!
We need to turn this mountain of disgraceful debt into a managable molehill. We need a teeth gritting, eye narrowing, fixed bayonets, take no prisoners, show no mercy, full metal jacket, pulp fact shoot on sight, Hamburger Hill taking, AFL Grand Final winning slash and burn rampage through the forest of unsustainable socialist spending and selective reward!

It's time for a BIG change!
When the polished privileged pampered politicians we appoint to safeguard our national treasury become like predatory pirates who plunder it, Voracious Vultures who devour it, and scheming scoundrels who squander it, or blind freddie who borrows it -when they allow ideological jihadists and  environmental extremists to call the tune for humankind, -you could be forgiven for thinking we need to make a few changes up there. Let's speak first about what we DON'T need.

-We don't need the tranquilizing narcotic of gradualism, *
-nor do we need the chemical relaxant of 'one on one' discussions,
-nor do we need to let off steam with yet another costly commission of enquiry
-nor do we need the anaesthetising influence of some fine tuning
-nor do we need the panadol of pooling political ignorance in 'frank and open negotiation'

What DO we NEED?

There is a negative and a positive dimension to this issue.

First the negative..
When gangrene has invaded your body, you don't give it a dab with some Dettol, you reach for your Black and Decker electric chain saw, plug the sucker in,  and you do  an AMPUTATION!
When a plague has broken out, and corpses are putrifying, you don't need a bandaide, you  need a Bonfire and an INCINERATION of the old and the birth of something completely new.
When the local politicians came out to John the Baptist he said "You brood of vipers!" so they said..quick, call the priest he has a demon! When Jesus came saying "new wine cannot be put in old wineskins, if you do, the skins will burst", they said he was a glutton and drunkard, don't listen to this crackpot" but John said:

"The axe is already at the root of the trees, and every tree that does not produce good fruit will be cut down and thrown into the fire." With an introduction like that.. no wonder the political establishment had problems with the performance of the prince of peace who came after John. Not only did Jesus speak of the meek inheriting the earth, he also managed to do the miraculous. Clearly,  a hit squad was needed.

We have a Prime minister who told the biggest bare faced lie of the century to the electorate, and we have an opposition leader with the blood still dripping from his hatchet used to massacre Pauline Hanson and one Nation, and commit grand theft larceny by taking many of her policies. But we have another small mob of lunatics who actually run our political show, they're Green on the outside but Red on the inside!

The only thing for this brood of political vipers- is....We should terminate their tenure and tip them onto the trash heap of 'past use-by date' and sing "this will be our last goodbye", -'The Carnival is over'!

Cicero once said: “The wise are instructed by reason, average minds by experience, the stupid by necessity and the brute by instinct!” and the only instinct the poverty stricken hungry have is for their next meal, and anyone who promises that will have their ear. But those promises are no better than the ones which got them into this disaster in the first place.

When things are this bad, the solution doesn't seem much better but there is no other way!

AsChurchill once said on May 13 1940

"I have nothing to offer but blood, toil, tears and sweat." ( I'm thinking that Greece could use a liberal dose of Churchill right now!)
He later said:

"Poor people, poor people. They trust me, and I can give them nothing but disaster for quite a long time."
I beg to move, -That this House welcomes the formation of a Government representing the united and inflexible resolve of the nation to prosecute the war with Germany to a victorious conclusion.

It seems to me, that we must remove the scales from our eyes, and look to how we can also form a type of Government that unites us and unflinchingly resolves to win the war against adversarial political partisanship and antagonistic greed!

Fellow Aussies, no one is hurling buzz bombs at us on our territory yet, or reigning down munitions upon our heads as it was for Churchill's England, though Bali came pretty close to it, but let me end with a quote from Ronald Reagan which sums up how a nation can slide into lethargy and end up in a lax apathy of she'll be right mate.

"We are at war with the most dangerous enemy mankind has ever faced in his long journey from the swamps to the stars. It is said if we lose that fight, and in so doing lose our freedom, history will look back and remark with the greatest astonishment, that those who had the most to lose, did the least to prevent it's happening"

By the time this ugly Duck has finished we won't only be down, we'll also be out for the count.
The preeminent question facing Australians today is this, "will I be one of those who does what needs to be done to fix the problem?".

You have the three weapons which every politician fears, you have your brain, your vote and you have your voice. It boils down to.... will you use them for the good of the  Nation?

Now the Positive dimension

The handout has some points you might like to consider on how we can do something toward this national renewal. Always remember this, Renewal, begins with.....'you' and it must happen in the heart, mind and will.

We need a renewed morality
We need a renewed respect
We need a new Joy
We need a new love
We need a new tenderness
We need a new faithfulness
We need a new Gentleness
and most of all we need a REASON to even go after those things.

All of those things must emerge from the heart...not the head. You cannot make men respect women by screaming for it in the streets. Women who scream at men, are unlikely to hold any respect for the species. Men who treat women like a commodity are unlikely to know true joy or to attract any respect from them but they might evoke screams in the streets. Will you be renewed? Will you join the battle? Can you grasp hold of the vision to turn individual personal renewal into a small step of a long journey, a growing tide, towards National Renewal?

HANDOUT - google "Towards principles of a  national renewal in Australia"

Tuesday, September 25, 2012

CFMEU.. are they Pro Worker?

So, you are a "worker" at some company and you think you deserve more?  Beware of those perfidious proclaimers of impossible prosperity, those who speak with a forked tongue using sophisticated syntax and perfumed paragraphs to seduce the susceptable, and grip the gullible.

They will promise you the sun the moon and every star in the sky, if only you will join them and appoint them as your representatives in industrial relations. 
Of course they'll have their stock in trade success stories. "Best wages and conditions in Australia" they will shamelessly strut back and forth like a prancing pony, delivering their harangue until they are hoarse, but not a syllable will they state  about those who's  jobs they have shamelessly squandered to China because the business became uncompetitive, unredeemable, unrecoverable and unfixable.

With their elegant siren song of 'we'll get you more, bigger and better'   they whisper,... "just join us!" they woo you and coo at you and ask for your hand in a marriage of industrial economic convenience, but then, when you  succumb to their swindle,  they seize  you in a vice like grip, and you surrender sound thinking and are carried away with them into the illusory mirage of unending, prosperity through ever growing wages and inflated conditions ; -then they peel off their 'nice' mask and they say "sit" and you sit, they say "jump" and you ask "how high", they say "stand" and you snap to attention on parade for your new despotic masters.

The honeymoon turns into a nightmare, the tenderness of the courtship gives way to the brutality of  ownership. Reality bites like a redback spider and the Son, Moon and Stars end up being nothing more than a crappy pebble of a small and insignificant burnt out meteorite!

They first learn how to be unconscionable, then they promise you the unsustainable,  trumpet the  undeliverable, only to do.... the unthinkable and unforgiveable.  Go slow tactics at a Childrens hospital construction site, delaying tactics at a new Cancer centre, all to get 'you' on the payroll as one of their members. Can you work on such a site with a clear consience?
They treat you as nothing more than a slave and a servant, a person who is now a pawn rather  than a prince.. one who is expendible in the greater scheme of Union leadership job security with Monster trucks, holiday getaways, lavish apartments, luxury cars and perhaps even prostitutes and ultimately their own political advancement.

But where are you ?  You languish in a line at centrelink and  get manic over your mortgage, frantic about your food bill, and are beset by a bunch of unpayable bills.....all because they killed your employers business with the death of a thousand pay rises,  and he had to give everyone a pink slip, including himself! - His lifes work, the investment of all his super, his long service, every cent he could beg borrow and but not steal, -he put it into his vision to create a business make a few bucks and employ people.. for what? So that some unscrupulous unionist could come along and turn his business mountain into nothing more than a small molehill of rancid smelly beans.

Beware oh workers.. of that Union wolf in grannies clothing.  "Granny, what big eyes you have! "Yes my child, all the better to find more ways of getting you higher pay!"  but Granny, what a big nose you have!"  "Yes my child,. all the better to sniff out opportunities to pressure your boss into giving you more!"... so you jump into bed with Granny, to receive her comfort and assurance, and then you notice and comment, 'but Granny, what big TEETH you have?"...and we all know how that story ends for Red Riding Hood.... it will end in the same way for any worker who jumps into bed with people who's primary goal in life is themselves and their power.

Remember, Judas betrayed Jesus with a kiss, but later he could not live with what he'd done to the Prince of Peace, and in despair  he hanged himself. Sometimes a kiss is the kiss of death.

Pawns are expendible in the game of chess. The kings and queens and bishops and knights have the power, and they place the pawns in positions that will sometimes result in their sacrifice for the greater good of winning the prize of ultimate authority.
Pray, and watch, that you will not be made  one of those sacrificial pawns.

There is a utopia to be had and enjoyed in this life, it's the one where you do the best you can with what you've got and are loved for who you are!


The Australian Defence Leage makes the following announcement and press release.

"The ADL wishes to outline the following legitimate criticism's of both Islam and Muhammad it's prophet.

ISLAM. as a set of idea's contains many commands, statements and permissions which are incompatible with Australian law and culture and to our mind the conscience of rational people.
The following specific points are of concern to us and we believe will also concern the broad spectrum of the Australian people when they realize the nature of the  ideological  content of Islam.

1/ SEDITIOUS INTENT of the Islamic Ummah.

1/ Approved and practiced child sexual abuse by marrying a child.
2/ Approved rape by soldiers on the battle field. (a crime against humanity)

1/ SEDITIOUS INTENT The call in Quran 9:29 to 'fight those who do not believe in Allah...until they pay the Jizya (tax) and feel themselves subjected' is from the context historically of a Caliphate in the sense of Muhammad being the first Caliph.  While some Muslims claim that such actions could only ever arise when there is an Islamic Caliphate (which does not exist at present) others claim that this command applies at all time. We understand that only those who are extremely passionate will actually verbalize these sentiments while Muslims remain a demographic minority in any land. We saw an example of that group  on September 15th. We affirm our belief, that the remainder of the Muslim community, if faithful to the Quran will also hold these ideas at least in embryo form and are more likely to act on them as their numbers and confidence grow.  Further confirmation of this can be easily presented in a context where time and space will allow such. (such as a debate or public speech)

A clear exposition of this mindset is found in the following hadith: (By Muslim)

Ibn 'Aun reported: I wrote to Nafi' inquiring from him whether it was necessary to extend (to the disbelievers) an invitation to accept (Islam) before fighting them. He wrote (in reply) to me that it was necessary in the early days of Islam. The Messenger of Allah (may peace be upon him) made a raid upon Banu Mustaliq while they were unaware and their cattle were having a drink at the water. He killed those who fought and imprisoned others. On that very day, he captured Juwairiya bint al-Harith. Nafi' said that this tradition was related to him by Abdullah b. Umar who (himself) was among the raiding troops.

2/  RELIGIOUS VILIFICATION OF NON MUSLIMS. The previous point about seditious intent, is underlined and justified in the Quran in the very next verse where Christians and Jews are described specifically by name as: (9:30)
-Cursed by Allah
-Away from the truth.
The reason they are thus described is connected with their core belief, not any act of aggression against Muslims. The core belief cited for the Christians is "They believe Christ is the Son of Allah"
Such descriptions of non Muslims are in our view, illegal in Victoria under the Racial and Religious Tolerance Act 2001  section 8

(1) A person must not, on the ground of the religious belief or activity of
another person or class of persons, engage in conduct that incites hatred
against, serious contempt for, or revulsion or severe ridicule of, that other
person or class of persons.
It would be abundantly clear to the average person, that describing a person's core belief as "deluded" is vilification in terms of the Act and holds that person up to public ridicule and serious contempt.

3/  PERMISSION FOR CHILD SEXUAL ABUSE and the commodification of females.
In the Chapter 65 of the Quran, verse 4, it speaks of 2 important things.
i) Divorcing girls who have not yet had their menses. (Pre pubescent)
ii) A waiting period called an 'iddah"
The iddah is proscribed to establish if the girl is pregnant. Thus, knowing a girl cannot be pregnant aside from intercourse, this passage justifies the marriage, sexual consummation and divorce of a prepubescent child by a man of any age.
Reference for this understanding is confirmed by Syed Abu Ala Maududi in Tafheem Al Quran on the passage.(Point *13) It is also confirmed by Ibn Kathir a respected Islamic commentator.

Chapter 23 v 5-6 are clear that a man may enjoy sexual relations with those his 'right hand holds'. ie.. captive women.


a) Muhammad himself demonstrated his approval of sexual relations with children when he commodified the daughter of Abu Bakar,(For his military value) arranging marriage with his daughter Ayesha when she was 6, and consummating that marriage when she was 9 and he aged 53.

b) Permitting himself to marry 'any woman who offers herself' (33:50) while denying that permission to ordinary believers. He also could use captive females whom he did not marry. This inclination is confirmed in Hadith tradition in Bukhari.

We harass, harangue, hound and tell Dennis Ferguson to go to hell when we know he is in our community. The reason is that he either chooses to, or feels he is born to, molest young children.
If we hold such an attitude in the moral fibre of Australian culture, it would be hypocritical not to apply the same standard to Muhammad. We do not accept that Muhammad was a 'man of his time' because Muslims are instructed to follow his example and to honour all his behavior.

c) In the attack on the  Banu Mustaliq tribe (by surprise, without warning) Muhammad is asked about coitus interruptus on the battle field. He advises not to do it, but his response suggests that full intercourse/rape is acceptable. (Hadith Bukhari Vol 3, book 46 number 718)

(Narrated Ibn Muhairiz: I saw Abu Said and asked him about coitus interruptus. Abu Said said, "We went with Allah's Apostle, in the Ghazwa of Barli Al-Mustaliq and we captured some of the 'Arabs as captives, and the long separation from our wives was pressing us hard and we wanted to practice coitus interruptus. We asked Allah's Apostle (whether it was permissible). He said, "It is better for you not to do so. No soul, (that which Allah has) destined to exist, up to the Day of Resurrection, but will definitely come, into existence." )

 CONCLUSION. The ADL believes that, in the same way that the Australian constitution provides guidance for Australia as long as it exists, the Quran and Hadith provide similar guidance, in terms of permissions and prohibitions for Muslims as long as they exist. 
We reject the idea that such interpretations are incorrect or taken out of context or a result of lack of knowledge of Arabic, we have confirmed all of the above by sound hermeneutic principle and by reference to the major schools of Islamic Jurisprudence and commentary which are accepted by mainstream Muslims world wide.

Did the "Slutwalk" attitude harm Jill Meagher?

Here's what we know.

Jillian Meagher is missing.  She left a bar in Sydney Road, Melbourne to walk home alone at 1:30 am.  She did not arrive home. Her handbag was found in Hope St not far away.

We all hope desperately that Jill will surface unharmed from this dissappearance.

Recently there have been loud and proud marches by many people, mostly women, to proclaim in umistakable terms "No....means no".   But when it somes to the harm to woman perpetrated by males, I cannot think that in any single case the woman did not say "No...don't hurt me".  Clearly, "no" might mean no to the woman, but to the stronger male harming her... it's meaningless. Males rape women, woman don't rape males.  There is a very fundamental reason for this unfortunate  fact in society. Males are stronger than females.

Ever since the infamous Sheik Hilali said women alone in skimpy clothes are like fresh meat to a prowling ally cat, Aussie women have been particularly outraged about that idea.  Again, that outrage does not change the sick mind of a male predator. I suppose one could try to find evidence that it has had some effect by counting the rape/molestation/sexual assault statistics before and after these marches, but I'm not aware of any study done.  The problem is,  it seems, that sexual assault is not a 'rational' act by a male. Stamping your feed, waving your handbag, screaming loud and proud are emotional acts yes, but they are also rational ones.. seeking to underline the evil of such behavior.
But delving into the mind of a rapist for a moment, I suspect they already know they are 'evil' and get off on that fact.

Did Jill Meagher walk home alone because she felt empowered by the boldness and confidence of the slutwalk movement?  It's an important question.  If she did, and she turns up harmed, I would place a portion of the blame for what happened to her at the feet of the 'slutwalk' movement and the mindset it creates. Yes.. really!

Look at nature. Every predator will give way to a bigger predator. A cheetah will run like hell from a lion, yet it will attack a small wilderbeast and kill it.  A lepoard will also run like hell from a Lion.. in fact just about EVery other predator will run from a lion. It's nature.

No amount of hysteria, incandescent rage, foot stamping, flag waving, slogan yelling, overly made up, skimpy clothed, banner holding march is going to change that as far as I see it. I suppose it might at best make a mild mannered undetermined predatorial male think a bit more... but that's something only some kind of scientific study would reveal.

The true evil of the Slutwalks. 
I think the real downside of these walks is that they do more to provide a political outlet and opportunity to those  politically correct opportunists who wish to capitalize on it than actually change any predator's behavior. So some of these women will be double victims. Firstly victims of the political and ideological agitators who just want to use them as passive pawns to raise their political profile, and then victims of the predatorial males who don't care squat about the noise, and who  harm the women who embraced the mindset promoted by the march!

If  any woman thinks she can walk home at 1:30 in the morning alone, in dark streets  she is asking for trouble. If any BLOKE does the same thing.. walking home alone at such a time, HE is asking for trouble.. but its a different kind of trouble. He might be just mugged or murdered for his wallet by some drug crazed desperado or a gang of ferals. She might be the victim of all that plus get raped. These are the realities of life, sadly.  I will not suffer ideological fools on this.  I can imagine any reader screaming at this blog when they read the words "asking for trouble"... because in reality she/he did not 'ask'...for trouble. It's a saying.  It reflects how we use words in society "If you cross that line between me and you, you are asking for trouble".. "If you throw that thing at me, you are asking for trouble".

"Asking for trouble" can be an active or a passive concept.  To walk through a forest when you've been told there is quicksand 'somehere' in it... is 'asking for trouble'...more of a passive act. You are simply choosing to wander through a place where you've been told there is danger. Hurling a rock at some other person, is 'active'.  So whether it's by passive neglect or actively annoying someone, the concept 'asking for trouble' is a valid description in my view of walking home late at night alone whether you are male or female.

Once again, we all hope Jill is alive and unharmed.

Sunday, September 23, 2012

Mein Kampf vs the Quran about Jews/Christians

1/    "If we were to divide mankind into three groups, the founders of culture, the bearers of culture, the destroyers of culture, only the Aryan could be considered as the representative of the first group." (Hitler-Mein Kampf)

2/   "Today I will be a prophet again: If international finance Jewry...should succeed once more in plunging the peoples into a world war, then the consequence will be...the destruction of the Jewish race in Europe." (Hitler-Mein Kampf)

3/  9:29 Fight those who believe not in Allah nor the Last Day, nor hold that forbidden which hath been forbidden by Allah and His Apostle, nor acknowledge the religion of Truth, (even if they are) of the People of the Book, until they pay the Jizya with willing submission, and feel themselves subdued. (Quran 9:29)

4/   9:30 The Jews call 'Uzair a son of Allah, and the Christians call Christ the son of Allah. That is a saying from their mouth; (in this) they but imitate what the unbelievers of old used to say. Allah's curse be on them: how they are deluded away from the Truth! (Quran 9:30)


The most glaring difference between these 2 sets of quotes, is that in Mein Kampf, Hitlers mention of the destruction of the Jewish race is conditional, in the Quran, the cursing and abuse of Christians and Jews is not...it is blatant and eternal. 
Mein Kampf    "If,   then".....
Quran      "fight..." ..(Jews and Christians) "are"  (cursed, deluded and far from truth)

Based on the grammar and syntax, it should be abundantly clear to even the prejudiced reader that the Quran is far more definite and unconditional in it's opinion and declaration about Jews and Christians.
Hitler did not advertise or make clear his ultimate action (we cannot say 'plan' with any certainty) to liquidate Jews completely, and if he did have such a plan when writing Mein kamp from prison, he clearly has the intellect and knowledge of history to realize that to put such a thing in writing before he had power would be utterly suicidal both politically and physically.

Such is the case with Islam, though the declarations of Islam are in fact quite clear in writing. This can be understood in terms of Muhammad writing the Quran in bits and pieces as the need arose. If he had declared he was going to subject all Jews to Muslim rule beFORE he had the power to do it, the Jewish tribes around the region would have finished him off well before he could harm them.
Surah 9 was written very late, after Muhammad had the entire Arabian Peninsula under his control and a terrifying army at his disposal.

We can pre-empt the usual littany of hysterical Muslim  apologists and remind them that we actually do know all your standard defences and they are illogical,  not in harmony with your own scholars, absurd and strained. Don't even bother.

The above quotes have not been 'cherry picked' to suit a purpose, they have been carefully selected to reflect the context in which they are found and conform to the interpretations of major Islamic scholars who are not fettered by the worry of making such explanations in a host state where Muslims are the minority.

IMPACT of the  QURAN on the mind.

PAKISTAN.  The current insanity and madness going on in Pakistan over the 'movie' is indicative of the effect the Quran has on the thinking processes of normally rational people.  If these people were in Australia and had a similar position of dominance, they would without doubt act the same. If those in Australia who manifested the same insanity last week were in a position of greater numbers, or if the community itself was something like 60% of Australia's population.. we would be seeing the same violence on a much bigger scale. 
Fortunately for Australia, we have a large majority of non Muslims, a decent police force and the rule of Law.

At this point there is value in quoting something someone else said 2000 years ago...it might be a better guide for human behavior.

"a new commandment I give to you, that you love one another, as I have loved you" (Jesus: John 13:34)

43 “You have heard that it was said, ‘Love your neighbor and hate your enemy.’ 44 But I tell you, love your enemies and pray for those who persecute you, 45 that you may be children of your Father in heaven. He causes his sun to rise on the evil and the good, and sends rain on the righteous and the unrighteous. 46 If you love those who love you, what reward will you get? Are not even the tax collectors doing that? 47 And if you greet only your own people, what are you doing more than others? Do not even pagans do that? 48 Be perfect, therefore, as your heavenly Father is perfect. (Jesus : Matt 5:43ff)

Oh what a contrast.. what a breath of fresh air, what a liberating set of idea's. How nice it would be to live in a place like that. I guess it's why we open our parliament with a prayer Jesus gave to His disciples. "Our Father....."

Obama v Romney :US Presidential Race -The American Masses are STUPID!

So proclaimed both Walter Lippman and one of his peers Edward Bernays.  They regarded the masses as like sheep..easily led.

Bernays should know, he invented public relations and wrote books on how to manipulate the Masses.

The 60s were in large part a revolt against the kind of America 'he' had created, ie.. a consumer society based on want rather than need.

But for you Yanks who think I'm being too hard on you, be of good cheer.. Australians are no smarter.. we ALL NEED A DAMN GOOD VERBAL FLOGGING and to be dragged kicking and screaming if necessary to have a look at a few basic truths of life!

See this entry regarding the desperate and degenerate state of US politics. Even Australia is not this bad.

LASH...LASH..LASH.. (that's a tongue lashing)  Obama will look after only those who have looked after him.

LOOOOOK...if you have the brains and fingers to do some googling..and see what his real track record is..

THE STUPIDITY of the masses is this.. they naively think that this or that side of politics is there for....'them'...the people.. rubbish rubbish rubbish.   Romney has yet to have a record, we can't yet say he is a bad President, but Obama ? He HAS  a record and it's one of economic nepotism.

I SOLEMNLY WARN YOU... that if you re-elect Obama and the Dems, you will probably plunge into civil war and social breakdown of a massive scale within 5 yrs.  US politics will be changed forever and will not be fixable unless it is by Hitlerian methods. Brutal and final.  The tragic part of that little prediction, is that by the time you get to this point... you will be so desperate for a "Messiah" or.. you will be so agonized at your alienation and powerlessness you will either gravitate to  such a "Messiah" who promises to deal with the problem in Hitlerian ways or.. you will just do it yourselves.  You will have the Hispanic/Black community at war with the White, because by that time the relentless influx of illegals will be such that they have the political power (even as illegals) to keep the flow going, and ultimately transform the cultural and racial texture of America.

This will result in the  hyper greedy and obliviously individualistic self serving blind whites waking up one morning and finding they are a minority, which might just lead to race hate groups having people rushing to join them in droves...which will lead to further polarization and total breakdown of society.  You whites who live in majority white areas.... don't let that illusion deceive you. You just might be the only such state soon.

THAT in turn will remove the one remaining obstacle for Islamists to use their hysterical and paranoid voices to scream at you in actions as well as sound.  Can you even begin to imagine where this could go ? The Pakistani's will not worry about trying to smuggle a Nuclear weapon onto US soil...they don't need to.. all they have to do is set a few up in ships off the coast in international waters and WHAMMO... KAAAABOOOOM.. tidle waves that you never thought possible. All major coastal cities could be taken out by such a method.

YOU CAN SEE how much they hate your values.. the news is riddled with images of hate filled mobs in over 30 countries burning and killing and raging... against..'you'.

WAKE....THE HELL....UP! America!

ROMNEY.."in"   and if Romney fails to perform... you can vote him out next time, but at least you will have the choice to do so.. if Obama get's in this time.. it will be "El Presidente for life".

INSIDER TRADING.. a crime for all but members of the US congress!

It must make you all as sick as it does me.  A person in Wall street has access to uncountable chunks of information which can (if he acted for personal benefit on it) make him 10 x BMW 7 series richer overnight. But of course.. those angels from Wall street would neeeeeevvverrrrr do that now would they?

But the most amazing thing about American politics which blows my mind, (being an Aussie) is that "insider trading" is quite legal for members of Congress in the USA!

So..here's how it works.

1/ "They" make the decisions which can make or break a particular segment of the economy.
2/ "They" can make appropriate investments to fit in with the decisions they make.
3/ "They" can sell their shares prior to everyone else finding out that a  decision will adversely effect a company.

EXAMPLE.  While this is not a 'congressmember' example it shows the close relationship between the Green industry and Congress.

Mr Environment from the UN  "Maurice Strong" was a director of MoltenMetals and a major shareholder.  The process has to be seen to be believed... it is found in this link which is quite verifiable and if you have the slightest doubt or prejudice on that score I can link you to actual lawsuit which followed the disaster (ie..disaster for the non "insider" connected shareholders who lost their shirts)
Ahh..what the heck.. here it is.. read and weep.  The image below is just a screen shot of the plaintiff's section

Notice the name..Maurice F Strong?

It seems to me, that America has lost it's way.  If it was worth saving, those currently running for office would make something of this nefarious and outrageous stench and make it illegal for them as it is for the ordinary citizens.
Obama has had 4 yrs to deal with this criminal thread in the fabric of US politics... he's done *nothing*.. can you guess why?

Saturday, September 22, 2012

Oh how the Secular establishment HATES the reality narrative of "slippery slope" (Corey Bernadi)

The intolerance of this extremist secular state establishment is all pervading.  Like the calculus concept of "lim" where the difference diminishes to 'approaching' zero, so too is this current extremist 'mainstream' intoleranct secularism seeking to stigmatize and marginalize proponents of previously 'mainstream' viewpoints.

Let's ask an important question. "How...did the change in values in Australia from viewing homosexual behavior as deviant and bad, change to 'normal and fine'?"

It happened of course by a 'slippery slope'.  It surely didn't happen over night. It occured by relentless activism of loud voices, violence, screams and howls of protest and other nefarious means.

So, that there 'is' a slippery slope is indisputable.  The secularists though believe this slope is upward ever upward and improving, whereas the Christians and conservatives who share their values if not their faith, see it as a downward slope.

As to which view is correct is not the point of this post, the goal is to highlight the intolerance of the secularists.  Bernadi simply opened up the package and showed what's inside. He expressed his opinion which also happens to be the opinion of a large (and voting) slab of Australia. Specially the Eastern Suburbs of Melbourne.  A point which various liberal incumbents might like to keep in mind.
(Tony Smith for example)

We would hardly vote Labor, and only the certifiably insane would vote Green, so that leaves... LNP ? no...it leaves an  independent.

Please see below two contrasting pieces of cut and paste.

1/    But the peculiar evil of silencing the expression of an opinion is, that it is robbing the human race; posterity as well as the existing generation; those who dissent from the opinion, still more than those who hold it. If the opinion is right, they are deprived of the opportunity of exchanging error for truth: if wrong, they lose, what is almost as great a benefit, the clearer perception and livelier impression of truth, produced by its collision with error.  (J.S. Mill "On Liberty")

... on him we put the White (good guy) hat.

2/   THIS essay examines the idea of tolerance in our advanced industrial society. The conclusion reached is that the realization of the objective of tolerance would call for intolerance toward prevailing policies, attitudes, opinions, and the extension of tolerance to policies, attitudes, and opinions which are outlawed or suppressed. In other words, today tolerance appears again as what it was in its origins, at the beginning of the modern period--a partisan goal, a subversive liberating notion and practice.  (Herbert Marcuse 1965 "Repressive Tolerance")

 and this bloke get's the black evil hat.

Marcuse was a Jewish neo Marxist of the Frankfurt School of social research. (Frankfurt, Germany) (it was going to be called the 'centre for marxism' but that didn't fly high as the National Socialists were on the rise)

Now CHRONOLOGY matters here.  The initial position in Australia was from 1777 to around 1970 where homosexual behavior was regarded as improper and deviant and sinful. So Marcuse' essay was active in the shifting of viewpoint and infected the humanities and entertainment fields at American Universities and Hollywood.

That which is not to be tolerated, even to be repressed (Think Tyrrany) is the 'old' initial view espoused by Bernadi.  And repression is exactly what happened in Parliament when he was invited to resign.

To those evil and intolerant extremist secularists (like the ABC and others, even Tony Abbot) I invite them to read Mills quote above and take it to heart.

ADL (Australian Defence League) rally on Sunday at 2:00 pm Sunday

IF... a rally was to go ahead this Sunday (23rd of September).... from my perspective the image below is the only thing we  need to communicate to the public and media.

Nuff said:

The Asian man on left is shaking hands with the ADL member on the right. (Looking at Image)

Wayne Swan-Schoolyard Bully and name caller.

Wayne Swan's infantile schoolyard bully remarks about "cranks and crazies" in the US republican party demonstrate the mental level of immaturity that we are used to seeing among the true crazies and ferals of rent-a-crowd Left wingers who regularly undermine our society.

It must be said with the minimum of words, so as not to allow Swan's atrocious remarks to steal any more of our lives than absolutely neccessary, that these 'Crazies' as Swan puts it, simply want a balanced budget and to reduce the US debt. In short "If you don't have it, you cannot spend it"

The number of United States cities which are declaring bankruptcy is increasing. Presumably Mr Swan would just keep spending what he does not have in order to remain in power if he was in the American situation.

Swan is full of hate, and is therefore a hate preacher,  and is also a cheap political opportunist who is willing to sacrifice your economic future on the blood soaked alter of his own ego and vanity-in the view of this blog.  My opinon of Tony Abbot (but not all the conservatives) is not much higher.
Of all the Conservavites the one who speaks his mind, heart and soul is Corey Bernadi and he has just experienced a Cicero like banishment.  If you wish to know what the social/political background was to Cicero's banishment (106bc)  then do a wiki search on him.  For the Swan's, Abbots and Gillards of this world... they might like to observe that eventually Cicero was called back and his destroyed property restored.  I've not mentioned the Greens yet, and that's because their lunatic and contradictory policies are not worthy of serious comment.  I'll just mention 2. They believe in "Global Governance" and "Self rule of all peoples"

-The Australian Constitution must recognise the prior occupation and sovereignty of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples.
-.4 all peoples have the right to self-determination.
-global governance is essential to meet the needs of global peace and security, justice, human rights, poverty alleviation and environmental sustainability. (from the Greens policy section of their web site)
Do you see the glaring and blatant contradiction between those ? "Self" determination and "Global" governance!  Imagine this, if 'self' determination of one cultural group mean't that a particular creeping thing would approach extinction.... how fast would the Greens invoke 'global' governance big stick to beat them into submission?  Probably faster than the Cern particle accelorator!

JULIAR GILLARD, supporter of childish schoolyard bully.

In a period where bullying is utterly obscene and widespread, and socially destructive, the message from the 'axis of evil' Swan (or is it....'Cuckoo'?) and Gillard have trashed all the good  done by many people over the past few years in combatting bullying, by a) Swan manifesting the must appalling and odious personal behavior, in using the infantile 'name calling' tactic against the ONLY economically sane people in America (it would seem) who wish to have a 'spend it only if you have it' balanced budget and fiscally responsible approach to politics. I won't bore you with copious quotes about the various American cities who now cannot pay their Public Service (ring a bell lately for Australia???)
you can google that yourselves. (it's not hard)

SWAN/GILLARD AXIS OF ECONOMIC TRAIN WRECK.  Yeppers...they are driving the train of state headlong toward that huge ravine over which the bridge has become rotten in the pylons, and can no longer withstand the weight of that train full of public service and spending passengers.

SWAN/GILLARD AXIS OF HYPOCRISY. The most pernicious aspect of this axis is that they are in fact themselves slashing and burning many jobs in the public service for the same reasons those 'cranks and crazies' in the Republican party want to. So it raises the serious question of 'Why'.....do they hack into and belt up other people doing the thing they know in their heart of hearts must be done?   It's simple really, gutter level political opportunism. "Posture"- "we are there for the battler and only we deliver major front line services to the public"   So, they have opted for the amoral "It's not what I do that counts, but what I say"... because behind this romp though the moral swamp, there is some very serious psychology lurking.  To find out why Politicans like Obama can go to one group of conservative Christians and speak about religious freedom and the importance of faith, yet then go to a completely contradictory group of gay rights advocates and spew out a message that "I look forward to the day when two men can walk down the isle in the same way that  a man and a woman can now"...   It's all deliberately tailored for each group.

That raises the crucial question 'What then...do they actually stand for???"

Now this is where you MUST (yes.. 'must') develop an understanding about the real nature of Democratic politics.   To comprehend this, you must realize that in a typical western democracy, there are two similarly sized voting blocks being "the Working class" and "The Business Class".
Politics boils down to posturing your party to attract the vote of one group or the other.
That begs the question "why?"... if it isn't for the measurable benefit of that particular group, for who then, is the party really acting?  Make no mistake, they do bring some benefits to their supporters, but that real benefit is so small it's insignificant. Example.. if all the pay (around $10million) of all the senior QANTAS executives was taken from them. (100%) and divided among each of the 35,000 QANTAS employees,  they would receive the spectacular amount of... wait for it.. around $250 each per year. (but then the plane would not have a pilot because he donned his chute way back and bailed out).
WHY then....?  do they do this?

ANSWER.  If you look closely at the pathway from "Union loudmouth/ shop steward/Organizer/national secretary/political candidate/ Member of parliament." you need then....to look at how such a person's financial interests become increasingly 'healthy'.  There are 3 major turn on's in life.. (from a male perspective) "Power".."Money" "Women" and most activity can be resolved into one or more of these and/or a combination of them. 

Is the Conservative side of politics excempt from this? Hell nooooo... they are just a variation on the same theme.  They simply posture themselves for a different group of voters, but for the same end.

PROOF.  I could drag links from here there and everywhere, but to wade though all those would probably bring on an epileptic fit even for the non epileptics.  A much more entertaining method is to bring you the single most important video that exists on Youtube, and here it is.  You will come away from this shaken and probably wondering how you let yourself be so shaped and moulded by various forces (from both left and right) to think as you do!


the second most important video is the next one below. How powerful is this video? You will find it was in part the inspiration behind Anders Breivik's, though his own criminal actions are not in any way suggested by the vidoe itself.  What IS suggested is how certain elements have hijacked our social conversation and attempted to hold it in a vice like grip for their own narrow and destructive ideological purposes.


These 2 pieces of information are 2 of the 3 things I would want people to know from myself before I left this world.  The 2 above will prepare you for this life, the 3rd piece is very simple and prepares you for the next life, while giving you a sound foundation for this one.

30 Jesus performed many other signs in the presence of his disciples, which are not recorded in this book. 31 But these are written that you may believe that Jesus is the Messiah, the Son of God, and that by believing you may have life in his name.  (John 20:30/31)

So there is 'my' agenda.. clear and distinct.. for all to see. But before you criticize it, have a look. Read say Marks Gospel from start to finish and see how the Words and Work of Jesus are in diametrical opposition to all of the above political opportunism.  "I came not to be served, but to serve and give my life as a ransom for many".... try as I will...I can't find 'political opportunism' in that.